Stan Craine reviews the Ripmax Trainer 40

The Model...

After a five years lay off from flying and with the vain hope of my teenage son joining in, I purchased an A.R.T.F. high wing Ripmax Trainer. The large colourful box contains the two wing halves, a main fuselage, tail and rudder along with a couple of bags containing almost all that is needed to complete the model. The assembly manual is fairly comprehensive and far better than some oriental imports.

What you will need are;
Fast and slow setting epoxy,
Superglue,
Pair of good pliers for bending control wire ends,
Small drill suitable for making a hole of the right diameter in the servo arms,
Silicon sealant to prevent fuel passing the neck of the tank and soaking into the airframe,
Short length of silicon fuel tubing,
Masking tape

The control surfaces are already hinged and pinned in place. The entire airframe is covered with a pre-painted plastic film. This covering was generally tidy but needed slight heating to remove wrinkles from the underside of the fuselage. This is a common problem. Supposedly due to the variation in climate between the Far East, where I believe the kit is manufactured and the UK. A small travel iron is a fraction of the price of genuine covering iron and works well if used with a bit of kitchen roll or lint free cloth.

On With The Build...

Very good assembly instructions are provided so what follows is a few minor improvements, alterations and observations.
Generally speaking the accessories were of reasonable quality but the plastic clevises seem a little “brittle”. If I could readily obtain different ones locally, I would have changed them. The spinner is a little too long and this prevents a good contact with the starter cone when trying to start the engine. For a small sum it would be worth purchasing one of similar diameter and replacing it.
Wheel collets are provided and I prefer to clean the end of the under carriage leg and solder a washer on to it to prevent the wheel sliding up and binding with the leg. I then file a small flat on the tip for the collet screw to seat on.

It’s difficult to land with one wheel missing!


The alloy engine mount has a clamp type fitting where the engine mountings on the engine case are sandwiched between two metal plates and the engine mount itself.

The underside of the mounting is grooved to hold the nuts whilst they are being tightened. Despite this I found fitting the engine awkward. A spare lock nut is provided for each bolt but I chose to fit nylon locking nuts. I was concerned that the engine may work loose and wreak havoc.
The side of the fuselage is fairly thin so I glued a pair of ¼ inch strips of soft balsa along the inside of the fuselage to provide a wider wing seating area. Once that was done I was able to fit wing-seating tape on top of this. The reasons for this are three fold, one it increases the wing seat area reducing the chance of creasing the wing, two it helps prevent the wing moving and three provides a seal to prevent fuel entering the compartment.
Joining the wings was fairly straightforward, my only variation being to use a dolly peg to ensure the trailing edge of the wings remained aligned. Once joined, masking tape was placed ½in either side of the central joint and slow setting epoxy was spread over the joint using a piece of plastic card. Remove any surplus glue and take the tape off by peeling it back on itself before glue has set leaving a tidy seam. This adds nothing to the strength but prevents moisture / fuel from soaking the joint Do not allow the glue to run, try to keep the wing horizontal to avoid this.
I used fine felt tip pen to mark the tail surfaces prior to removing the covering for gluing. Careful use of a scalpel blade is needed to avoid damage to the balsa tail/ rudder but the covering MUST be removed to ensure the tail surfaces are glued correctly. ( See later )
One item I did find to be a trouble spot was the steerable nose wheel. The arm is set at 90 degrees to the wheel and parallel to the engine bulkhead. This limits the travel to the left. To reduce this problem I opened up the hole for the throttle wire and placed a piece of fuel tubing over the wire to act as a sleeve. The bulkhead was also sealed with a polyurethane varnish to prevent fuel soaking under the covering. Once happy with the fuel tank position I used clear silicon sealer to close the gap around the neck of the tank. The plan shows a three tube fitting on the tank but the one supplied only had two. This doesn’t make a great deal of difference it just means that you remove the pressure feed from the exhaust to fill the tank. A different colour fuel tube helps to identify the fuel feed from the pressure feed.
I used a dolly peg once more to hold the control surfaces whilst I aligned the neutral positions of the servos. The peg is simply ( gently ) pushed over the gap between the control surface and the fin / tail etc to hold it in place enabling you to measure point at which to bend wire at servo arm end.
The servo arms are connected to the operating rods with small metal fasteners. These are basically a threaded cylinder with a hole in the side and a screw protruding through the bottom. ( A common device found on a lot of ARTF models ) The easiest way I found was set the servo arm so that at neutral it was at 90 degrees to the body of the servo. Having selected an arm of suitable length I drilled the arm to fit the screw in the fastener. Insert a small screwdriver into tube and screw the retaining screw into the arm and then superglue the lock nut on the other side of the arm.

The engine I chose was an OS 40LA. Other than running in as directed by the manual little else was needed to get the engine performing well with a reliable tick over. I found it unnecessary to adjust the slow idle screw and would suggest you don’t tamper with this unless absolutely essential. The servo arm linkage makes fine adjustment a simple case of slacken the grub screw and moving the connecting rod a fraction in the required direction.


Flying...

Having waited for a nice bright day with little breeze, about twice a year in the UK between October and March, I took the trainer to the local flying site.

Having checked servo throws, throttle setting, confirmed centre of gravity, range checking the radio etc. (again ) I refueled, started the engine once more ( Having warmed it up already ) checked mixture setting by inclining the fuselage 45 degrees I finally put the plane on the tarmac runway. Viewing the runway ahead I saw a lump of turf directly in line with my intended flight path. Well to be safe I thought, I pushed the tail plane forward to adjust the direction slightly. It was at this point that my shin made contact with the right tip of the tail. Despite this being a light contact the leverage was sufficient to SNAP the left fuselage side and top decking along with the joint at the front edge of the rudder. I am not exaggerating, this contact was very slight and I am absolutely amazed at the damage that was done. There is no way that I would superglue this damage and consider flying without checking the underlying structure. See picture

Removal of the covering revealed a very thin fuselage side (Almost transparent) and a distinct lack of adhesive on the fuselage former that is positioned just behind the crack. This little episode has shattered my confidence in ARTF models.
A repair has been made but I will consider building from kits as a better option in future, at least you know what’s under the skin.
To be fair, I may have been unlucky with this model in regard to the quality of materials and building. Another identical model used by a fellow member of my club ( About 10 years of age!!! ) has given good service and flies as you would expect of a trainer with a flat wing section.

Now waiting for better weather, the second attempt I’m hoping will at least see it move off the ground.

 

Update - 18/04/04...

The Ripmax trainer has redeemed itself and has proved to be a delight to fly. Despite my previous "minor" adjustment to the models airframe, it flew straight off the board and needed very little trim adjustment. With the control surfaces set up as per the instructions it will perform all the manoeuvres a trainee pilot could need. The dihedral and flat bottomed wings don't help in my aerobatic routine! Landings have proved easy providing they are into wind! The model is lightly loaded and can be affected by any sudden gusts or side winds. Ground handling is excellent, this is the first model that I have been able to taxi into the take off position, land and then bring back without a good walk at some point in between.The excellent ground handling has been greatly assisted by the OS40 LA (fitted without side thrust ) which has proved to have plenty of power and superb tick over. No forced dead stick landings being a big plus for a novice . The foam rubber tyres will need replacing fairly soon and it would be worth fitting slightly larger wheels especially if flying off grass.The only other modifications I would suggest is to slot a small piece of plastic or nylon into the wing tips as these will scuff the ground first on those," less than perfect landings".

The only other modifications I would suggest is to slot a small piece of plastic or nylon into the wing tips as these will scuff the ground first on those," less than perfect landings".

To date all my attempts to return it to its component parts have been unsuccessful. Overall the Ripmax Trainer and the OS40LA have been an excellent combination but " Handle with care" when transporting.


Article by Stan Craine for Bumpy Green Model Aerodrome
March
2004

Comments left by others...
Comment by Paul Trew on 20040415005310. Rating 4

I have spent a year as a total novice playing on the great planes flight sim on my pc. Getting very itchy feet as soon as the opportunity presented itself i went to my local model shop and bought a Ripmax 40 Trainer. I have only ever built one other model a free flight about 20 yrs ago. Crashed on its 1st flight !!! The Ripmax i found very easy to build but "ARTF" as a mere Novice can be ? well ..... for me 20 hrs plus ! Not many problems on building but i did have to hand an "old Hand" .. so that def makes things easier. My old hand took the plane up and down on its 1st flight and was amazed at how well balanced she was !!!! Me being pig headed (with all my G2 Great Planes PC sim experience) took the plane up 2nd flight and "WHHHOOOAA" ... this was amazing .. i FLEW it without crashing it and looked "Apparently" .. at ease with the whole thing ? !! :) I have now had 15 successfull take offs + landings and we are getting there !! this plane flies on rails and i cannot say enough for my training on the flight sim G2 (Great planes) .. it "WORKED" !!!! The Ripmax 40 seems good 2 me .. but i reckon you need the time on them sticks ... very smalll move ments eh ! boys :) Happy Flying ALL ... im well HOOKED !! 4 sure !!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by daz on 20040416233957. Rating 4

i picked up one of these for my boys to learn on i can say that they are very stable in flight and easy to land will do basic areos loops rolls stall turns etc and the tank seems to just last and last not the best of the bunch but not bad

Comment by gerry on 20040425200304. Rating 5

the ripmax 40 was my first plane and i have nothing bad to say about it .

Comment by Martin Dyson on 20040501203548. Rating 4

I have one for "light relief" fitted with a 46LA It does not bunt! but will, if pushed, spin. Great fun. I do things with it which would make its designer break out in a cold sweat.

Comment by Matthew on 20040513122847. Rating 5

The trainer 40 is a fabulous plane but you should do a review on the rubbish twinstar

Comment by Nick on 20040527162314. Rating 4

I learnt to fly last year with this trainer, powered by an OS46FX & think it's a great first plane. It survived some very doggy landings with little upkeep. The only critisism I have is that it's a shame the building instructions are not as good as the Irvine Tutor 40, but ha ho!

Comment by Bill McQueen on 20040607081109. Rating 4

I learned to fly with the Ripmax Trainer 40, fitted with a TT GP 42 engine. I have been very impressed with this plane as it is very easy to fly.

Comment by william on 20041003222220. Rating 4

a good plane but not sure if i should of got the ivine tutor 40

Comment by Chathura Rodrigo on 20041124094032. Rating 1

Could you please send me a full specification of the engine & it's mountings

Comment by Paul Downes on 20050419202604. Rating 5

I have just started flying and I can say that this aero is just right for the beginner to start with. I have not attempted a take of yet but on a very windy day I was forced to try to land it due to the guy who was with me did not want responsability for breaking it, I hit the ground with a thud and the thing is still going strong without any damage. I do agree that some of the airframe is weak in places but I have just tried to be careful and not split the sides when picking it up which I can see as being easy to do. I will get there in the end and I can see that this plane will be the tool to do it, providing i don't crash it hard :). I did'nt bother with the steering front leg as many club members advised me that they are all pretty useless whatever kit I was to buy. Chow

Comment by Paul Downes on 20050506104452. Rating 5

Well I have been at it for just over 5 weeks now and I have successfully passed my A cert with this plane. I have flew it to death and it is raring for some more. I have had good feedback about the irvine Tutor 40 at the club and I think either of these are a good first buy. Happy landings P.S. had a slightly harder landing than the first but still in one piece. Chow

Comment by Paul Downes on 20060325002315. Rating 5

Well my Ripmax Trainer 40 is still alive after the bashing i have given it so far. It gave me enough confidence to move up to a Ripmax Expression and boy was that a cool plane, even though i made it go home in a bin liner at the end of the first day lol. I just wanted that last flight. Since then I have flown an Edge 540 that is just Crazy!!! My Trainer may just see the sky again this weekend for a jolly out and about. Will go inverted all day as long as you can fight the Dihedral.

Leave your comment...


Untitled Document

VIEW / ADD Your Comments

This is where you can leave your comments about the article itself or about the subject of the article. For example maybe its a review and you would like to tell people about the experience you have with this particular model.

Name:

Email Address (optional):
Rating:
Excellent = 5
Comments: